Which statement most accurately describes a language tree relationship?

The statement indicating that Polish grew out of Balto-Slavic accurately describes a language tree relationship because it illustrates the concept of language classification and evolution. In linguistics, a language tree represents the historical development of languages over time, showing how they descended from common ancestors. The Balto-Slavic language group is a branch of the larger Indo-European family, and Polish is part of the Slavic subgroup that emerged from this common ancestral language.

This assertion is grounded in the understanding that languages evolve and diverge from shared roots, with various languages branching off from these roots over millennia. In this context, Polish is a descendant of the Balto-Slavic language group, which connects it to other Slavic languages while also distinguishing it from non-Slavic ones.

The other statements do not accurately reflect language relationships: the claim that Polish developed under the influence of English overlooks the historical and linguistic lineage that specifically connects Polish to Balto-Slavic origins. The idea that English is the basis for all European languages disregards the diverse and distinct family trees of different language groups across Europe. Lastly, the assertion that all languages are equally related implies a uniformity in language development, which contradicts the complexity and specificity of language evolution represented in a